Timeline · Last reviewed 2026-05-16

Timeline 1972–present

Summary

Chronological documentation of the Dutch Protocol from the founding of the VU adult transgender clinic in 1972 to the current period of international revision. Each entry refers, where possible, to the underlying primary source. Rows are clickable via anchors (e.g. /timeline/#y2014).

YearEventSource / reference
1972VU Amsterdam starts adult transgender care under Louis Goorenprotocol/origins
1987–1988First GnRH agonist prescribed to a 13-year-old adolescentstudies/cohen-kettenis-1998
1997Cohen-Kettenis & van Goozen — first adolescent follow-upJAACAP
1998Case report publication — formal introduction of the protocolEur Child Adolesc Psychiatry
2006Delemarre & Cohen-Kettenis — formal protocol descriptionstudies/delemarre-2006
2009Endocrine Society Clinical Practice GuidelineJ Clin Endocrinol Metab
2011de Vries et al. — first follow-up study n=70studies/de-vries-2011
2012WPATH SOC-7Int J Transgenderism
2013Steensma — desistance in childrenstudies/steensma-2013-desistance
2014de Vries — cohort study n=55 ("Amsterdam study")studies/de-vries-2014
2017Endocrine Society revised guidelineJ Clin Endocrinol Metab
2018Dutch Quality Standard Transgender Careguidelines NL
2018AAP Policy Statement (Rafferty et al.)Pediatrics
2020NICE evidence reviews — GnRHa and CSHUK
2020-06COHERE guideline FinlandCOHERE 2020
2020-12Bell v Tavistock — first rulinglegal cases
2021-05Karolinska policyKarolinska 2021
2021-09Bell v Tavistock — Court of Appeal overturnsEWCA Civ 1363
2022-02SBU systematic review (Sweden)SBU 2022
2022-06Florida AHCA reviewFlorida review
2022-09WPATH SOC-8 — age thresholds removed after publicationWPATH SOC and DP
2022-12Socialstyrelsen guideline (Sweden)Sweden
2023-03Ukom report (Norway)Norway
2024-03WPATH Files publicationWPATH Files
2024-03NHS England withdraws GnRHa reimbursementUK
2024-04Cass Review — final reportCass Review
2024-12US v Skrmetti — Supreme Court oral argumentslegal cases
2026ZonMw interim report on the Dutch evaluation expectedZonMw

Critical note

The timeline shows that the centre of gravity of the evidence lies before 2014 (two Dutch cohort publications, n=70/55), while the expansion of the protocol — both in inclusion criteria and in geographic spread — continued thereafter without independent replication confirming the original findings. The cluster of evaluation reports 2020–2024 (NICE, COHERE, Karolinska, SBU, Ukom, Cass) marks a turning point: for the first time the original assumptions are systematically scrutinised, with the shared conclusion that the evidence base is weaker than implementation assumed.1

See also

Footnotes

  1. Cass H. Independent review of gender identity services for children and young people: final report. NHS England; April 2024.