Studies › Follow-up · Last reviewed 2026-05-16

Follow-up studies overview

Summary

Long-term data on the Dutch Protocol remain limited. This page collects published cohort and outcome studies, with sample size, follow-up duration, attrition and main findings. Systematic reviews by NICE (2020), SBU (2022) and the University of York for the Cass Review (2024) classify the cumulative evidence as low to very low.

Overview (selection)

StudynFollow-upMain finding
de Vries 201170≥ 2 yrs GnRHaImprovement in psychological functioning
de Vries 2014551 yr post-opDysphoria resolved, functioning at peer level
Costa et al. 2015201 (UK, GIDS)18 monthsNo improvement vs. control group
Carmichael 202144 (UK, GIDS early intervention)~3 yrsNo significant improvement on mental outcome measures
Brik et al. 2020269~2.4 yrsGnRHa-phase discontinuation 1.9%
van der Loos 20227203–14 yrs98% start CSH after GnRHa; continuation bias reported
van der Loos 20231,766NPB/CSH continuation1.9% stop before CSH; 0.5% reported regret

Common limitations

  • No RCTs in this clinical domain.
  • Varying attrition rates (0–22%).
  • Heterogeneous outcome measures — comparison between studies hindered.
  • Long-term data (10+ years) largely missing.

Conclusion of systematic reviews

Both SBU (2022) and the University of York systematic reviews for the Cass Review (2024) classify the level of evidence as "very low" per GRADE criteria — primarily due to absence of control groups, limited follow-up and risks of selection and attrition bias.1

Critical note

The claim "98% start CSH after GnRHa" is presented by proponents as confirmation of diagnostic certainty; by critics as evidence that the "diagnostic phase" is not a reflection phase but a first treatment step. Both interpretations are compatible with the same data — which demonstrates that the outcome measures themselves are not informative enough to answer the crucial question (does this treatment help, compared with no treatment?). A Finnish register study (Ruuska et al. 2026, cited in public commentary) reports increasing psychiatric care consumption after treatment.2

See also

Footnotes

  1. Taylor J, Mitchell A, Hall R, et al. Interventions to suppress puberty in adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria. Arch Dis Child. 2024; University of York / Cass Review systematic review.
  2. Genderzorgen. Transgender care under scrutiny. Substack, 10 April 2026 (translation by editors).